Developing the School Safety Perception Scale: The Validity and Reliability of Study
The purpose of this research is to develop a scale to determine the perceptions of teachers working in secondary schools related to school safety. Alongside the social actors, the elements involved in achieving the goals of educational activities are important actors in the solution and implementation of the school security problems. Therefore, the actors performed in this way and were want teachers' perception of safety education activities in schools is critical. The research includes a scale development study. Certain steps in the scale of development for secondary teacher’s perceptions of school safety were monitored. Reliability and Validity Scale with work related to the development of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes were performed. Exploratory factor analysis of the obtained 40-item scale 54.233 discloses % of the total variance. Analyzes showed that reliability coefficients of scale factors ranged from .769 to .893. These values are enough to pass to the confirmatory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that SSS is a valid tool to measure teachers’ perceptions about school safety. Structures of this study, data collected through school safety scale set Cronbach's alpha was calculated in order to determine the internal consistency. Application in terms of behavior and School Safety "Although low compared to other dimensions of size with .61, scale and reliability coefficients ranged between .80 and .93 for the dimensions have been determined to be highly reliable. İmplications for Research and Practice: With the help of the developed scale, relations between school safety perceptions and personal variables, organizational stress, school climate, use of security technologies, occupational burnout and organizational commitment can be examined. Effects of student perceptions of school safety on their academic success can be researched. Similar scales can be developed for parents, administrators, preschool, elementary school teachers, lecturers, and university students.
Argon, J., Anderson, L. (2000). School security by the numbers. American School and University, 72(1), C1-C11.
Bayram, N & Bilgel, N. (2008).Evaluating life standards of Turkish immigrants in Sweden with Structural Equation Models. 9. Symposium of Econometry,
Bayram, N. (2010). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi İzmir.
Benekos, P. J., Merlo, V., Cook, B. (2002). A priliminary study of student attitudes of juvenile justice system. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13(2), 273- 296.
Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2003). Theory and Practice in Education Management, Ankara:Pegem A Yayınları.
Büyüköztürk, Ş.& Şekercioğlu, G. V & Çokluk, Ö. (2014). Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: Applications of SPSS and LISREL . 3. Print, Ankara: Pegem A Yayınları.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Çakmak, E. K & Akgün, Ö. E & Karadeniz, Ş & Demirel, F. (2014). Scientific Research Methods. 18. Print, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Çankaya, İ. (2010). The Effect of School Security on Primary School Teachers' Anxiety, Motivation and Job Satisfaction Levels. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Elazığ: Fırat University, Social Sciences Institute.
Demirtaş, İ. Y. (2007). Primary School Teachers and Teachers’ Roles and Expectations Regarding Security. Unpublished master thesis, Sakarya: Sakarya University, Social Sciences Institute
Dönmez, B. (2001). Okul Güvenliği Sorunu ve Okul Yöneticisinin Rolü. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 7(25), 63-74.
Dönmez, B & Özer, N. (2009). School Safety and Safe School. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi
Education Encyclopedia. (2009). School climate – measuring school climate, school celimate and outcomes, issues trends and controversies. Date of access: 23.07.2018, http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2392/School-Climate.html
Erçek ,M.K.(2017) The Role of School Security from Factors Affecting Teachers' Engagement: Akademic Social Research Journal, Year: 5, Issue: 49, July 2017, p. 478-496
Günden, C & Miran, B. (2008). Determining the Environmental Attitudes of the Farmers with the New Environmental Paradigm Scale: The Case of Torbalı District of İzmir Province, 18, 69, 41–50.
Gorman, K. and Pauken, P. (2003). The ethics of zero tolerance. Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (1), 24-36.
Gottfredson, D. C., Gottfredson, G. D., Hybl, L. G. (1993). Managing Adolescent Behavior: A Multi-Year, Multi-School Experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 30 (1), 179-216.
Işık, H. (2004). Okul Güvenliği: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, S:164, Ankara, Güz-2004, MEB yayınları
Hernandez, T. J & Seem, S.R. (2004). A safe school climate: A systemic approach and the school counselor. Professional School Counseling, 7(4). Date of access: 22.07.2018 http://www.schoolcounselor.org/files/7-4-256%20Hernandez.pdf
Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust, The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379-403.
Joreskog,K.G&Sorbom,D.(1993). Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. From
Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific Research Method. Ankara.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4): 370-396.
Myers, W. H. (2000). A structural equation model of family factors associated with adolescent depression.
O’reılly, E. M., Verdugo, R. R. (1999). Safe School İndicators: The Data and Social Policy. Education and Urban Society, 31 (3), 334-348.
Özer, N. (2006). Secondary School Students’ Perceptions About School Safety. Unpublished Science Expertise Thesis, Malatya: İnönü University, Social Sciences Institute.
Öğel, K& Tarı, I. & Eke, C. Y. (2005). Prevention of Violence and Violence in Schools. İstanbul: Yeniden Yayınları no:17.
Payne, A.A., Gottfredson, D.C., Gottfredson,G.D. (2003). Schools as Communities: The Relationship Between Communal School Organization, Student Bonding,and School Disorder. Criminology, 41:749–778.
Pişkin, M. (2002). Okul Zorbalığı: Tanımı,Türleri, İlişkili Olduğu Faktörler Ve Alınabilecek Önlemler. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 3 (2), 531-562.
Tak, B & Çiftçioğlu, B. A. (2009). A Field Study on the Reliability and Validity of the Three Dimensional Professional Commitment Scale in Turkish. Management Faculty Journal, Vol:10, Issue:1,35-54.
Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Measuring attitudesande SPSS Data Analysis.Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Turhan, M & Turan, M. (2012). Safety in Secondary School Institutions. Education Management: Theory and Practice. Vol.18, Issue: 1,121-142.
Wagner, R. (2002). School Violence in Children and Adolescents: A MetaAnalysis of Effectiveness. Journal of School Violence, 1: 5–34.
Welsh, W. N. (2000). The effects of school climate on school disorder. Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Sciences (Annals-Aapss), 567, 88-107.
Yılmaz, K. (2004). The opinions of primary school teachers about the relationship between supportive leadership behaviors of school administrators and school trust. Journal of İnönü University Faculty of Education, 5(8), 117–131.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work