The Role of English Debating Tournament in the Face of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)

Husnawadi Husnawadi, Syamsudarni Syamsudarni

Abstract


Since its establishment in the late 2015, the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) with English as the official language has forced its participating countries to improve the quality of English language teaching, in the hope to prepare their people to be globally competitive. The lack of English proficiency, however, remains the main challenge across the country members.  English forensic or debating tournament has been proven to bring about globally competitive individuals in terms of being highly competent in English together with having higher order thinking skills. Grounded in Indonesian context, this paper presents (1) typology of English debating tournaments in Indonesia, (2) how English debating improves the language competence and critical thinking skills by drawing on some of respective research, (3) An example of its practice in an EFL classroom in Indonesia and its principles, (4) and its implications on the teaching of English in Indonesian.

Keywords


English Debating, AEC

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aclan, E. M., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2015a). Exploring parliamentary debate as a pedagogical tool to develop English communication skills in EFL/ESL classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2), 1-16. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.1

Aclan, E. M., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2015b). Why and How EFL Students Learn Vocabulary in Parliamentary Debate Class. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 102-113.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Education

Deane, A. (n.d.). A guide to british parliamentary debating and the world universities debating championships. Retrieved from:

https://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/WUDC%20Malaysia_2014_Debating_and_Judging_Manual.pdf

Departement Pendidikan Nasional, Derektorat Jenderal Managemen Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah, Direktorat Pendidikan Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas. (2009). Debating Handbook.

Fauzan, Umar. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability of EFL Students through Debate and Peer Assessment. EFL JOURNAL, Vol 1. No 1, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v1i1.8

Hall, D. (2011). Debate: Innovative teaching to enhance critical thinking and communication skills in healthcare professionals. Int. J. Allied Health Sci. Prac, 9, 16-19.

Healey, R. L. (2012). The power of debate: Reflections on the potential of debates for engaging Students in critical thinking about controversial geographical topics. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 239-257. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2011.619522. https://uofadebate.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/guide_deane.pdf

Jagger, S. (2013). Affective learning and the classroom debate. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(1), 38-50. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.746515.

Jerome, L. & Algarra, B. (2005). Debating debating: A reflection on the place of debate within secondary schools. The Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 493-508. doi: 10.1080/0958517500384610.

Kennedy, R. (2007). In-class debates: Fertile ground for active learning and the

cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 183-190. Retrieved from http://isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE19(2).pdf#page=83.

Kennedy, R. R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 225-236.

Majidi, A. (2013). English as a global language; Threat or opportunity for minority languages? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,11(4), 33-38. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n11p33

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston, USA: Heinle, Cengage Learning

Oros, A. L. (2007). Let's debate: Active learning encourages student participation and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(3), 293-311. doi: 10.1080/15512160701558273.

Othman, M., Mohamad, F., & Amiri, F. (2013). An english debate league competition among lower form students: An experiential learning activity. US-China Foreign Language, 11(11), 840-852.

Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: an overview. Retrieved from http://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf

Richards, J. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York , USA: Cambridge University Press.

Sekretariat Program DIII-GK PPG Kejuruan. (2005). Buku Panduan Lomba Debat SMK. LKS Denpasar Bali.

Sugiharto, S. (2015, December 26). The bilingual curriculum: A panacea? TheJakarta Post. Retrieved from: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/12/26/the-bilingual-curriculum-a-panacea.html

Tessier, J. T. (2009). Classroom Debate Format. College Teaching, 57(3), 144-152.

Wu, L., & Ben-Canaan, D. (2006). The impact of globalization and the Internet on English language teaching and learning. Aust. J. Educ, 1-15.

Yaakub. M. N. (2015). Challenges in education towards the realization of ASEAN community 2015. Retrieved from:

http://www.site.rmutt.ac.th/cpscworkshop/materials/sp.pdf

Yang, C. H., & Rusli, E. (2012). Using debate as a pedagogical tool in enhancing pre-service teachers’ learning and critical thinking. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 8(2), 135-144




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i1.353

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Contact us: DINAMIKA ILMU; Address: FTIK, IAIN Samarinda; Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: journal.dinamika@gmail.com