Effect of Students’ Term and Educational Institution on the Arising of Indonesian Morphology-Syntactical Interference in ELLT

Dwi Astuti Wahyu Nurhayati, Djatmika Djatmika, Riyadi Santosa, Tri Wiratno


This research examines the two factors which effect on the raising of Indonesian morphology-syntactical interference. It aimed at delineating the potential effect of these two factors on the arising of Indonesian morphology-syntactical interference of undergraduate students majoring in English department of State Islamic Institute of Tulungagung and PGRI teacher training college of Tulungagung. 213 Javanese undergraduate students were selected based on two-step purposive sampling. To collect data, the researcher used observation and questionares in which the participants answered a set of 12 open-ended questions to measure the students’ term along with educational institution and Indonesian morphology-syntactical interference. To analyze the data, t-test on correlation and coefficient as well as linier stepwise multiple regressions were conducted through Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17. Data analysis indicated that the independent variables significantly correlated with Indonesian morphology-syntactical interference. In addition, multiple regressions analysis specified different higher institution as the main contributing variable and students’ term as the second one on the arising of Indonesian interference. It also showed that students of English departments of state Islamic institution of Tulungagung got higher scores on the arising of Indonesian morphology-syntactical interference than those of PGRI teacher training college of Tulungagung. The reason may refer to the supporting environment that is higher language exposure. The results highlighted the longer the students’ term they have, the lower score on the arising of Indonesian morphology-syntactical interference they produce.




students’ term, institution, Indonesian interference, Morphology-syntactical, ELLT

Full Text:



Arronof, M, & Fudeman, K. (2005). What Is Morphology? Balckwell Publishing

Arshad, U., & Kahn, F. (2015). Morphosyntactic deviation of verbs: A study of undergraduate’s writings. Asian Journal of Social & Humanities, Vol. 4(2), 176-187.

Ary, D., Jacobs, C.L., Sorensen, C., Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th Ed). USA: Wdsworth, Cengage Learning.

Astin, W. A. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory. Journal of College Development, Vol. 40 (5), 518-529.

Austin, J. (2009). Delay, interference and bilingual development: The acquisition of verbal morphology in children learning Basque and Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, Vol.13 (4), 447-479.

Baranek, K.L. (1996). The effect of rewards and motivation on student achievement. Thesis. Graduate Program of Grand Valley State University.

Bock, K. & Griffin, Z.M. (2000).The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177-192.

Bock, K, & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gemsbacher (Ed), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic press.

Cassie, D. (2012). Effects of academic anxiety on the performance of students with and without learning disabilities and how students can cope with anxiety at school.Thesis.Graduate program of Northern Michigan University.

Chang, F., Dell, G.S., Bock. K., & Griffin, Z.M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217-229.

Chemiron, K E. (2015). Effects of English language proficiency on performance of physics in national examination in west Pokot County in Kenya. Thesis. Graduate Program of University of Nairobi.

Devos, J. N. (2016). Peer interactions in new content and language integrated settings. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

El-dali.M.H. (2010). Does form-focused instruction affect l2 learners performance?: focus on grammatically judgments. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, 57-99.

Ellis, R. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching, (217-228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquistion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ferreira, V.S., & Bock, K. (2006). The function of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Process, 23, 1011-1029.

Fowler, H.W. (2009). Dictionary of modern English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gas, S. M. ,& Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York : Routledge.

Granena, G. (2014). Language aptitude and long-term achievement in early childhood L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, Vol.35 (4), 483-503.

Haskell, R. T., Thornton, R., & Macdonald C. M. (2009). Experience and grammatical agreement: statistical learning shapes number agreement production. Cognition, 114, 151-164.

Lieber, R. (2009). Introducing morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Murcia, C.M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrel, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics. Regents of the University of California, Vol. 6 (2), 5-35.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2015a). Morphological process and morphophonemic process of Alay variation. Lingua. Vol. 12, (1), 59-70.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2016b). Word formation processes and techniques in understanding waria slang Tulungagung. EFL Journal, Vol.1 (1), 59-87.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2016c). Phonological system of Tengger dialect in ngoko speech level. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, Vol.1 (1), 1-12.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2016d). Using local drama in writing and speaking: EFL learners’ creative expression. JELTL, Vol. 1 (1), 51-77.

Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2016f). Investigating morphological process of payandra on Javanese metaphor. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics 2016, Vol. 1 (3), 245-259.

Priyatna, D. (2013). Analisis Korelasi Regresi dan Multivariate dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Pudin, et al. (2015). Exploring L1 Interference in the Writings of Kadazandusun ESL Students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 2015

Stern, H.H. (1999). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stump, T.G. (2003). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suleymanov, O.A.Y. (2015). The interference process at the morphological and syntactical levels. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Vol. 2(1),582-587.

Sutopo, H.B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Penerapannya dalam Penelitian. Sebelas Maret University Press, Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A Surakarta.

Thompson, I. (2014). Indonesian (Bahasa Indonesia). http://aboutworldlanguages.com/bahasa-indonesia (Online, retrieved on 20 March, 2017).

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Department of Educational Research Lancaster University: The higher Education Academy.

Ur, P.M. (2009). A course in language teaching practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Usha, P. & Kader A.N. (2016). Syntactic and morphological error analysis in English language among secondary school students of Kerala. ISOR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), Vol.21 (2),1 , 99-103.

Van Valin, Jr. D. R. (2001). An Introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, M. & Burden, R.L.(2000). Psychology for language teachers. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v17i1.739


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact us: DINAMIKA ILMU; Address: FTIK, IAIN Samarinda; Jl. H.A.M. Rifadin, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia. Email: journal.dinamika@gmail.com