Mengembangkan Model Pengukuran dan Struktural untuk Menilai Interrelasi Pengetahuan dengan Akhlak Siswa

Zurqoni Zurqoni

Abstract


Moral in the context of school education management is essential, and execution of education of moral cannot be separated from the quality of learning and teaching, and assessment system. The application of assessment of moral knowledge and moral behavior in Madrasah Aliyah (MA) is still conventional and partial. The purpose of this research is: (a) to develop an assessment model of moral applied to assess students’ moral in Madrasah Aliyah; and (b) to find out the influence of students’ knowledge of moral on their own moral. This research produces a measurement model in the form of an internal structure consisting of dimensions of moral measurement, and a structural model relating moral with the knowledge of moral.

This research applies research and development model. The subjects are students  of MAs. Data analysis utilizing Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). CFA applied to analyze conformity of measurement model, while SEM applied to analyze conformity of structural model using software LISREL 851. Conformity of measurement and structural model based on the criteria of r-value >0.05, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0.08, and Goodness of Fit Index  (GFI)  > 0.90.

The result of this development research can be concluded as follows. The internal structure of assessment model of learning and teaching including willingness, conscience, value, attitude and moral behavior dimensions is considered as a good assessment model to assess students’ moral in Madrasah Aliyah. It is based on the result of  CFA, namely low factor loading value 0.39 (λ > 0.30), r-value = 0.0804 > 0.05; RMSEA = 0.074 < 0.08; and GFI= 0.98 > 0.90. The structural model relating moral and knowledge is regarded as a good model based on r-value = 0.08207 > 0.05; RMSEA= 0.005 < 0.08; and GFI = 0.97 > 0.90. The influence of  students’ knowledge of moral  on  their own moral (γ1=0,61) are significant.

Keywords


Asesmen, Akhlak Mulia, Pengetahuan

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD

References


Achmad Mubarak, Jiwa dalam al-Qur’a, Jakarta: Paramadina, 2000

Aep Saefudin, Akhlak dalam perspektif wacana pemikir muslim, Ta’dib, 2002, 2, 1.

Ahmad Amin, Kitab al-akhlaq, Beirut-Lubnan: Dar al-Kitab al-‘Araby, 1974

Al-Ahwani, A.F., Al-tarbiyyah fi-al-Islam. Cairo: Darul Ma’arif, t.th.

Al-Baqi, M.F.A., Al-Mu’jam al-mufaras li alfaz al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1992.

Al-Ghazali, Ihya’ ulum al-din. Jilid III. Damaskus: Dar Al-Fikr, t.th.

-----------, Khuluq al-muslim. Kuwait: Darul Bayan, t.th.

Alken, L.R, Psychological testing and assessment, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1977

Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. , Introduction to measurement theory, Colifornia: Broks/Cole Publishing Company, 1979

Al-Qasimi, M.J., Mau’izatul mu’minin, II,. Cairo: Dar al-’Usur li al-Taba’ wa al-Nasyr, 1969

Anderson, L.W., Assessing affective characteristic in the schools, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1981

-----------, Assessing affective characteristic in the schools, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1981

Asmaran As., Pengantar studi akhlak. Jakarta: Rajawali, 2002

Azwar, S., Sikap manusia: Teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005

-----------, Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Relajar, 2007

Baharuddin dan Eka Nur Wahyuni, Teori belajar dan pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Arruz Media, 2008.

Bahrul Hayat, Manual item and test analysis (ITEMAN). Jakarta: Puslitbangsisjian Balitbang Dikbud, 1997

Barmawi Umary, Materi akhlak, Solo: Ramadhani, 1993

Bednar, A. & Levie, W.H. , Attitude-change principles. Dalam M. Fleming & W.H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1993

Bird, C., Social psychology. New York: Appleton Century Co., 1967

Black, P. dan Wiliam, D. , Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 1998, 80, 2, 139-148.

Borg, W. R. & Gall. M. D,. Educational research (4th ed.). New York: Longman, 1983

Cennamo, K. & Kalk, D., Real world instructional design, Canada: Thomson Learning, Inc., 2005

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. , Introduction to classical and modern test theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winsten, 1986

Darraz, M.A., Dustur al-akhlaq fi al-Qur’an. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1973

Derryberry, W.P. & Thoma, S. J. , Moral judgment, self understanding, and moral action: the role of multiple constructs. ProQuest education journals, 2005, 52, 1.

Djemari Mardapi, Pengukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi. Kumpulan makalah seminar dan lokakarya. Yogyakarta: PPs. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2002

-----------, Pengembangan instrumen penelitian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: PPs. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2005

Fazio, L.S., The delphi: Education and assessment in institutional goal setting: Dalam David S. Cordray & Mark W. Lipsey (Eds). Evaluation studies: Review annual, Colifornia: Sage Publications, Inc., 1987,11.

Fernandes, H.J.X. Testing and measurement. Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluating and Curriculum Development, 1984.

Gerungan, WA., Psikologi sosial. Bandung : Refika Aditama, 2000.

Getzels, J.W., The problem of interest: A reconsideration. Dalam H.A. Robinson (ed.). Reading: Seventy-five years of progress. Supplementary Education Monographs, 1966.

Hambelton, R.K., Swaminathan, H. & Roger, H.J., Fundamental of item response theory, Newbury Park: Sage Publication, 1991.

Hampshire, S., Freedom of individual. New York: Harper, 1966.

Hendrix, W. H., et al., Multimethod approach for measuring changes in character. Journal of research in character education, 2004, 2, 1.

Ibrahim Anis, Al-Mu’jam al-wasit. Mesir: Darul Ma’arif, 1972.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T., Meaningful assessment: A managable and cooperative process. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.

Jones, E.E. & Davis, K.E., From act to disposition: The atribution process in person perception. Dalam Berkowith, L. (ed.). Advence in experimental social psychology, New York: Academic Press, 1965, 2, 219-266. http:// home. comcast. net/ icek. aizen/ book/ chz.pdf.

Jőreskog, K.G. & Sőrbom, D., Lisrel 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1996.

Kniker, C.R., You and value education. Ohio: Charless E. Merrill Publishing Company, 1977

Kohlberg, L., The cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. New Jersey: Printice Hall, Inc., 1977

Koplan, R.M. & Saccuzzo, D.P., Psychological testing: Principles, aplication and issue. Monterey: Broks/Cole Publishing Company, 1982

Kumaidi, Interpretasi koefisien korelasi skor-butir dengan skor total uji kebermaknaan koefisien reliabilitas KR-20 dalam penelitian pendidikan dan psikologi. Jurnal ilmu pendidikan, II, 2, 2004, 107-113.

Lai, K. R., & Lan, C. H., Modeling peer assessment as agent negotiation in a computer supported collaborative learning environment. Educational technology & society, 9, 3, 2006.

Lickona, T., Education for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books, 1991

Lickona, T. (Ed.). Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issue. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.

Mehren, W.A. & Irvin, J.L., Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. Fort Worth: Hartcourt Brace College Publisher, 1991

Mulyana, R., Mengartikulasikan pendidikan nilai. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2004

Naga, D.S., Pengantar teori skor pada pengukuran pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma, 2002

Naga, D.S., Ketidaktepatan penggunaan validitas butir dan koefisien reliabilitas dalam penelitian pendidikan dan psikologi, Jurnal ilmu pendidikan, II, 2, 2004, 99-106.

Nitko, A. J. dan Brookhrat, S. M., Educational assessment of students, 6th ed. New Jersey: Person Educational Inc., 2007

Noonan, B. & Duncan, C. R., Peer and self-Assessment in high schools, practical assessment, research & evaluation. A peer-reviewed electronic journal, 2005

Nunally, J.C., Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1970

-----------, Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1981

Pedhazur, E.J., Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wiston, Inc., 1982

Peter, Ji et al., A measurement model of student character as described by the Positive Action Program. Journal of research in character education, 3, 2005

Plomp,T., Design methodology and developmental research in education and training, Enschende-Netherland: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology (FEST), University of Twente, 1982.

Rokeach, M., The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1971

Rudd, A. & Stoll, S., Measuring students' character in secondary education: The development of the principled thinking inventory. Journal of research in character education, 2, 2004

Siti Muri’ah, “Penilaian Akhlak Mulia: Mengembangkan Model Alternatif Penilaian Akhlak Mulia dalam Pembelajaran”, dalam Jurnal Ulumuna, IAIN Mataram, 2012Skinner, B.F. About behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books, 1976

Solimun, Structural equation modelling (SEM), lisrel dan amos. Malang: FMIPA UNIBRAW, 2002.

Tessmer, M., Planning and conducting formative evaluation. London: Kogan Page Ltd. 1993. http:// www. geocities. com/ zulkardi/ books.html.

Viswanathan, M., Measurement errorr and research design. London: Sage Publication, 2005

Weeden, P., Winter, J. & Broadfoot, P., Assessment: What’s in it for school, New York: Routledge Falmer, 2002

Witkin, B.R., Assessing need in educational and sosial programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1984

Zurqoni, Menakar Akhlak Siswa, Yogyakarta, Arruzz Media, 2012




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/fj.v9i1.720

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




FENOMENA by FENOMENA: Jurnal Penelitian is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id/index.php/fenomena/index

Email : jurnal.fenomena@gmail.com


Indexed and Abstracted by: