Islamic Law and Copyright In Academic World: The Dynamic Debates between Privatization and Distribution of Knowledge

Darmawati Darmawati

Abstract


The article explores copyright problem dynamic in a globalized academic world, especially in the Muslim worlds. The discussed issue in this paper is a conflict of interest between knowledge privatization and distribution, and its relation to the Islamic norms. This paper argues that the main problem of the concept is that the discourse is dominated by the idea of knowledge privatization by the publishers as capitalists, supported by the Government through the policy represented in Copyright law. This study finds that there are several movements emerged in response to the development of copyright law. At least, there are two stream movements; anti copyright movement and movement which demand copyright reform. By presenting examples of copyright resistance movements in the academic world such as Sci-Hub, Libgen, A2K movement, and some copyright experiences in the Muslim world, this article will be guided by Foucauldian genealogical discourse theory. This article confirms that the interests of publishers and academic interests are two things that are difficult to discuss in order to achieve a win win solution. While copyright laws favor the ruling interests of things, it does not fully effective in handling the legal cases on academic and non-profit matters. Besides, Islamic law has its own ambivalence to the copyright case. On the one hand, Islam advocates the widespread dissemination of knowledge, but on the other hand the Muslim worlds have to limit the spread of the sciences in accordance with the interests of intellectual property rights.

Keywords: Intellectual Property right, Islam and copyright, privatization of knowledge.



Full Text:

PDF

References


“Alexandra Elbakyan – Science Should Be Open to All Not Behind Paywalls |.” Accessed August 24, 2017. http://www.leafscience.org/alexandra-elbakyan/.

Al-Zuhailiy, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmiy Wa Adillatuh. Vol. 3. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1989.

Andrew, Edward. “Class in Itself and Class Against Capital: Karl Marx and His Classifiers.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique 16, no. 3 (September 1983): 577–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900023994.

Arribas-Ayllon, Michael, and Valerie Walkerdine. “Foucauldian Discourse Analysis.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, edited by Carla Willig and Wendy Stainton-Rogers, 91–108. London: Sage, 2008. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/24763/.

Butt, Simon. “Intellectual Property in Indonesia: A Problematic Legal Transplant.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, May 8, 2009. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1401093.

“Court Orders Shutdown of Libgen, Bookfi and Sci-Hub.” TorrentFreak (blog), November 2, 2015. https://torrentfreak.com/court-orders-shutdown-of-libgen-bookfi-and-sci-hub-151102/.

Deazley, Ronan, Martin Kretschmer, and Lionel Bently. Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright. UK&US: Open Book Publishers, 2010.

DOAJ. “Directory of Open Access Journals.” Accessed August 30, 2017. https://doaj.org.

“Elsevier Wants $15 Million Piracy Damages From Sci-Hub and Libgen.” TorrentFreak (blog), May 18, 2017. https://torrentfreak.com/elsevier-wants-15-million-piracy-damages-from-sci-hub-and-libgen-170518/.

Given, Lisa M. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage, 2008.

Machin-Mastromatteo, Juan D., Alejandro Uribe-Tirado, and Maria E. Romero-Ortiz. “Piracy of Scientific Papers in Latin America: An Analysis of Sci-Hub Usage Data.” Information Development 32, no. 5 (November 1, 2016): 1806–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916671080.

Madigan, Kevin. “Judgment Against Sci-Hub Is a Win for Authors and Publishers.” Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (blog), June 27, 2017. https://cpip.gmu.edu/2017/06/27/judgment-against-sci-hub-is-a-win-for-authors-and-publishers/.

Md, Moh. Mahfud. “Pewadahan Etika Keilmuan Di Dalam UU Hak Cipta.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 6, no. 12 (September 16, 1999): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol6.iss12.art3.

Murphy, Kate. “Opinion | Should All Research Papers Be Free?” The New York Times, March 12, 2016, sec. Opinion. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/opinion/sunday/should-all-research-papers-be-free.html.

Noronha, Fredrick. Access to Knowledge: A Guide for Everyone. Consumers International, 2010.

Performance of Copyright Industries in Selected Arab Countries: Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia. WIPO, 2003.

“Politik Hukum Hak Cipta: Meletakkan Kepentingan Nasional Untuk Tujuan Global | Riswandi | Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM.” Accessed August 22, 2017. http://jurnal.uii.ac.id/index.php/IUSTUM/article/view/5009/4441.

Publications, USA International Business. Middle East and Arabic Countries Copyright Law Handbook. Int’l Business Publications, 2007.

Riswandi, Budi Agus. “Hukum Dan Teknologi: Model Kolaborasi Hukum Dan Teknologi Dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Hak Cipta Di Internet.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 23, no. 3 (2017): 345–367.

Schiermeier, Quirin. “US Court Grants Elsevier Millions in Damages from Sci-Hub.” Nature News. Accessed August 23, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.22196.

“Sci-Hub: Removing Barriers in the Way of Science.” Accessed April 6, 2018. https://sci-hub.tw/.

Senewe, Emma Valentina Teresha. “Efektifitas Pengaturan Hukum Hak Cipta Dalam Melindungi Karya Seni Tradisional Daerah.” Jurnal LPPM Nidang EkoSosBudKam 2, no. 2 (2015).

Suyūthi, Jalāluddīn al-. Al-Fāriq Baina Al-Mushānif Wa Al-Syāriq. 1st ed. Cairo: Ālim al-Kutub, 1998.

“Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014.” hukumonline.com/pusatdata. Accessed August 22, 2017. http://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/lt5460681737444/node/14/uu-no-28-tahun-2014-hak-cipta.

Waelde, Charlotte. Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.

“WIPO-Administered Treaties: Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.” Accessed September 4, 2017. http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/text.jsp?file_id=283698.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/mj.v17i1.948

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Mazahib by Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id/index.php/mazahib/index

Email MAZAHIB: redaksi.mazahib@gmail.com


Indexed and Abstracted by: